Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000195547 | SCV000252190 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2014-11-10 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | p.Trp4Gly (TGG>GGG): c.10 T>G in exon 1 of the REEP1 gene (*NM_022912.2) The W4G variant has not been published as a mutation, nor has it been reported as a benign polymorphism to our knowledge. It was not observed in approximately 3,900 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The W4G variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved across species. However, in silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic mutation or a rare benign variant. The variant is found in NEUROPATHY panel(s). |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000641687 | SCV000763334 | uncertain significance | Hereditary spastic paraplegia 31 | 2023-03-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 215086). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with REEP1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces tryptophan, which is neutral and slightly polar, with glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 4 of the REEP1 protein (p.Trp4Gly). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Prevention |
RCV004755809 | SCV005365899 | uncertain significance | REEP1-related disorder | 2024-03-06 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The REEP1 c.2T>G variant is predicted to disrupt the translation initiation site (Start loss). This variant was reported in an individual with mental decline, gait anomalies, muscle anomalies, and positive Babinski sign (Case 13, Table 1, Cui et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32501971). This variant has not been reported in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. |