ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_001458.5(FLNC):c.7090C>T (p.Arg2364Cys)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00006  dbSNP: rs374973240
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 9
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Invitae RCV000822078 SCV000962863 likely benign Myofibrillar myopathy 5; Distal myopathy with posterior leg and anterior hand involvement; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 26; Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant 2024-01-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneDx RCV001357140 SCV001793210 uncertain significance not provided 2021-03-04 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Reported in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance (ClinVar Variant ID# 664067; Landrum et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25617006)
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV002307631 SCV002600684 uncertain significance not specified 2022-10-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: FLNC c.7090C>T (p.Arg2364Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Filamin/ABP280 repeat (IPR001298) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.4e-05 in 249450 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 6 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FLNC causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (1.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.7090C>T in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: both classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign.
Ambry Genetics RCV002363167 SCV002663081 uncertain significance Cardiovascular phenotype 2022-04-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.R2364C variant (also known as c.7090C>T), located in coding exon 42 of the FLNC gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 7090. The arginine at codon 2364 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This alteration (described as R2331C) has been reported in a cohort of subjects with sporadic inclusion body myositis (Weihl CC et al. Neuromuscul. Disord., 2015 Apr;25:289-96). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV002495178 SCV002797687 uncertain significance Myofibrillar myopathy 5; Distal myopathy with posterior leg and anterior hand involvement; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 26 2021-08-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Revvity Omics, Revvity RCV001357140 SCV003833141 uncertain significance not provided 2021-05-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003396451 SCV004105273 uncertain significance FLNC-related disorder 2022-11-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The FLNC c.7090C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg2364Cys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.012% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/7-128494921-C-T). A different nucleotide substitution affecting the same amino acid (p.Arg2364His) has been reported in an individual with myofibrillar myopathy (described as R2331H, Weihl et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25617006). Although we suspect that the c.7090C>T (p.Arg2364Cys) variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV001357140 SCV004698370 uncertain significance not provided 2023-12-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001357140 SCV001552508 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The FLNC p.Arg2331Cys variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs374973240) and in ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae) but was not identified in the literature or in LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 19 of 280826 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000068 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 3 of 24190 chromosomes (freq: 0.000124), European (non-Finnish) in 15 of 128596 chromosomes (freq: 0.000117) and East Asian in 1 of 19536 chromosomes (freq: 0.000051), but was not observed in the Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), South Asian or Other populations. The p.Arg2331 residue is conserved in across mammals and other organisms and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.