Total submissions: 2
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invitae | RCV001211522 | SCV001383065 | uncertain significance | Desmin-related myofibrillar myopathy | 2022-11-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on DES protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 201720). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with DES-related conditions. The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 105 of the DES protein (p.Arg105Cys). |
Ambry Genetics | RCV002321729 | SCV002607660 | uncertain significance | Cardiovascular phenotype | 2019-05-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.R105C variant (also known as c.313C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the DES gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 313. The arginine at codon 105 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |