Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000236202 | SCV000292979 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2025-02-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
3billion, |
RCV001808665 | SCV002058507 | uncertain significance | Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D | 2022-01-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | It is observed at an extremely low frequency in the gnomAD v2.1.1 dataset (total allele frequency: 0.000011, PM2_M). In silico tool predictions suggest damaging effect of the variant on gene or gene product (REVEL: 0.717, PP3_P). Therefore, this variant is classified as uncertain significance according to the recommendation of ACMG/AMP guideline. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV002229802 | SCV002508583 | uncertain significance | Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 | 2024-03-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 102 of the GARS protein (p.Lys102Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs369224847, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with GARS-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 245830). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt GARS protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |