Total submissions: 5
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV001713203 | SCV001939524 | likely benign | not provided | 2019-03-07 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV002073342 | SCV002347080 | likely benign | Naxos disease; Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 | 2024-11-17 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV002241386 | SCV002511866 | likely benign | not specified | 2022-04-25 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: JUP c.1551G>A alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 245748 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1551G>A in individuals affected with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Both laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. |
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV003150455 | SCV003838227 | likely benign | Cardiomyopathy | 2022-03-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV004039967 | SCV005018393 | likely benign | Cardiovascular phenotype | 2024-01-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |