ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_002471.4(MYH6):c.71T>C (p.Leu24Pro)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs1320990570
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 4
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV001174568 SCV001337730 uncertain significance not specified 2020-01-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: MYH6 c.71T>C (p.Leu24Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251480 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.71T>C has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with Cardiomyopathy (Seidelmann_2017). The report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001294383 SCV001483258 uncertain significance Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 2023-03-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MYH6 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 917551). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of MYH6-related conditions (PMID: 28087566). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 24 of the MYH6 protein (p.Leu24Pro).
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV002505756 SCV002817046 uncertain significance Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1; Dilated cardiomyopathy 1EE; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14; Atrial septal defect 3; Sick sinus syndrome 3, susceptibility to 2021-10-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV003163385 SCV003864565 uncertain significance Cardiovascular phenotype 2023-01-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.L24P variant (also known as c.71T>C), located in coding exon 1 of the MYH6 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 71. The leucine at codon 24 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been reported in a subject with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), atrial fibrillation and bradycardia who also carried a second missense alteration in MYH6 (Seidelmann SB et al. Circ Cardiovasc Genet, 2017 Feb;10:). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.