ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_002485.5(NBN):c.1124+6G>T

gnomAD frequency: 0.00013  dbSNP: rs375862750
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 11
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000127086 SCV000170639 benign not specified 2014-02-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Invitae RCV000199990 SCV000254760 likely benign Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency 2024-01-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000127086 SCV000697937 uncertain significance not specified 2019-05-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: NBN c.1124+6G>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 251304 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in NBN causing Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (0.00012 vs 0.0025), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1124+6G>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer and colorectal cancer (Tung_2014, Yurgelun_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome. A co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported (BRCA1 c.4357+1G>A; LabCorp), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Two labs classified the variant as likely benign while two classified as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as a VUS - possibly benign variant.
Counsyl RCV000199990 SCV000798092 uncertain significance Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency 2018-02-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV000587851 SCV000806408 likely benign not provided 2017-11-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000587851 SCV001469583 likely benign not provided 2021-07-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Genome-Nilou Lab RCV000199990 SCV002045938 likely benign Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency 2021-11-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Sema4, Sema4 RCV000581770 SCV002536574 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-01-04 criteria provided, single submitter curation
Ambry Genetics RCV000581770 SCV002746926 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2014-09-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Natera, Inc. RCV000199990 SCV001457042 uncertain significance Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency 2020-01-10 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001354937 SCV001549668 likely benign Malignant tumor of breast no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The NBN c.1124+6G>T variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, or Zhejiang Colon Cancer Databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs375862750) “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity; submitters: benign by GeneDx and uncertain significance by Invitae), and Clinvitae (2x). The variant was identified in control databases in 30 of 277024 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0001 increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The c.1124+6G>T variant is located in the 5' splice region but does not affect the invariant +1 and +2 positions. However, positions +3 to +6 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. 5 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.