Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000801325 | SCV000941098 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2024-05-09 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 102 of the NTHL1 protein (p.Met102Ile). This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with NTHL1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 646936). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Gene |
RCV000801325 | SCV002569422 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2022-03-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
Ambry Genetics | RCV002442659 | SCV002753733 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-11-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.M102I variant (also known as c.306G>C), located in coding exon 2 of the NTHL1 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 306. The methionine at codon 102 is replaced by isoleucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |