ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_002878.3(RAD51D):c.26G>C (p.Cys9Ser) (rs140825795)

Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 10
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000587404 SCV000149721 uncertain significance not provided 2018-10-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is denoted RAD51D c.26G>C at the cDNA level, p.Cys9Ser (C9S) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Cysteine to a Serine (TGC>TCC). RAD51D Cys9Ser has been reported in numerous patients with breast, ovarian, or colorectal cancer, as well as in at least four controls (Loveday 2011, Wickramanayake 2012, Golmard 2013, Gutierrez-Enriquez 2014, Song 2015, Tung 2015, Yurgelun 2017, Hauke 2018). This variant was also observed in a woman from a cohort of unselected ovarian cancer cases whose tumor showed loss of heterozygosity, suggesting this variant may have been related to tumorigenesis in that patient (Wickramanayake 2012). RAD51D Cys9Ser was observed at an allele frequency of 0.07% (88/124,366) in individuals of European ancestry in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). This variant is located within the ssDNA and XRCC2 binding domains (Miller 2004, Kim 2011). In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether RAD51D Cys9Ser is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV000115812 SCV000185831 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2019-03-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Insufficient or conflicting evidence
Invitae RCV000587404 SCV000287702 likely benign not provided 2019-03-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Counsyl RCV000231466 SCV000488471 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial 4 2016-06-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color RCV000115812 SCV000537513 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-05-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV000587404 SCV000602155 uncertain significance not provided 2018-12-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America RCV000587404 SCV000698094 likely benign not provided 2016-05-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant Summary: c.26G>C (p.Cys9Ser) is a missense mutation that occurs at a conserved position, and 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome (SNP&Go not captured here due to low relability index). Although being reported by reputable databases/diagnostic centers as a VUS, the observed allele frequency in the large and diverse ExAC cohort is 0.00035 (47/131676 chrs tested), which is nearly 3-fold greater than the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic RAD51D variant (0.00012). This allele frequency highly suggests that this variant is a benign polymorphism. Although the variant has been cited in breast/ovarian cancer patients, co-segregation and co-occurrence information was not provided, and in one gastric cancer family, a MAP3k6 variant co-occurrence was identified that authors consider to be likely pathogenic (Gaston et al 2014). Taken together,the variant has been classified as Likely Benign.
PreventionGenetics,PreventionGenetics RCV000587404 SCV000806577 uncertain significance not provided 2017-01-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000709461 SCV000839205 uncertain significance Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome 2018-07-02 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
EGL Genetic Diagnostics,Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics RCV000587404 SCV000861249 uncertain significance not provided 2018-05-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.