ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.144+3G>T

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs761057565
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 5
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000529772 SCV000651716 likely benign Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 2025-01-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV000563004 SCV000667147 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-03-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000563004 SCV001346387 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2021-09-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant causes a G to T nucleotide substitution at the +3 position of intron 2 of the RAD51D gene. RNA functional studies have reported that this variant does not affect RNA splicing (PMID: 31642931). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 18/282826 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
GeneDx RCV001555608 SCV001777054 uncertain significance not provided 2019-09-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Also known as IVS3+3G>T; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31642931)
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV000529772 SCV001552820 uncertain significance Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The RAD51D c.144+3G>T variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs761057565) as “NA”, ClinVar (classified uncertain significance by Invitae and Ambry Genetics) and in control databases in 17 of 277220 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00006 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include Other in 1 of 6466 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002) and East Asian in 16 of 18870 chromosomes (freq: 0.0008), while not observed in the African, Latino, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The c.144+3G>T variant is located in the 5' splice region but does not affect the invariant +1 and +2 positions. However, positions +3 to +6 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.