ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_003923.3(FOXH1):c.1049A>G (p.Asp350Gly)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00045  dbSNP: rs138792321
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 4
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000557713 SCV000629757 uncertain significance Holoprosencephaly sequence 2024-12-25 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 350 of the FOXH1 protein (p.Asp350Gly). This variant is present in population databases (rs138792321, gnomAD 0.06%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with holoprosencephaly and/or tetralogy of Fallot (PMID: 18538293). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 458508). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt FOXH1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000557713 SCV001324996 uncertain significance Holoprosencephaly sequence 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories RCV001811035 SCV001472721 uncertain significance not provided 2020-03-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The FOXH1 c.1049A>G; p.Asp350Gly variant (rs138792321) is reported in the literature in two individuals affected with holoprosencephaly, one of whom was homozygous for the variant, and another individual with tetralogy of Fallot (Roessler 2008). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.02% (67/274084 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The aspartate at codon 350 is weakly conserved, but computational analyses (SIFT: damaging, PolyPhen-2: benign) predict conflicting effects of this variant on protein structure/function. This variant also exhibited decreased ability to rescue zebrafish morphant defects, however the extent and significance of such decreased activity is unclear. Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Asp350Gly variant is uncertain at this time. References: Roessler et al., Reduced NODAL signaling strength via mutation of several pathway members including FOXH1 is linked to human heart defects and holoprosencephaly. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Jul;83(1):18-29.
GeneDx RCV001811035 SCV005201838 uncertain significance not provided 2023-12-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20497191, 18538293)

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.