ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.-22-6T>C

gnomAD frequency: 0.00044  dbSNP: rs141962118
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 15
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000219387 SCV000271797 likely benign not specified 2020-02-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.-22-6T>C variant in GJB2 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.09% (114/126646) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), a T>C change at this nucleotide position does not diverge from the splice consensus sequence making it unlikely to impact splicing, and computational splice prediction tools do not predict an impact on splicing. While it has been previously reported in 6 individuals with hearing loss, these individuals were heterozygous and a second GJB2 or DFNB1 pathogenic variant was not identified (Tang 2006, Stanghellini 2014, Figueroa-Ildefonso 2019, LMM Data). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 228700). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1_Supporting, BP4, BP7.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000219387 SCV000698236 likely benign not specified 2022-02-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: GJB2 c.-22-6T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00049 in 249434 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00094 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. Though this frequency may rule out an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance, it is not higher than the estimated maximum for a pathogenic variant in GJB2 causing Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (0.026), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.-22-6T>C, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (Tang_2006, Stanghellini_2014, Figueroa-Ildefonso_2019), however in none of these cases was a second GJB2 mutation in trans detected. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments with a majority consensus as benign/likely benign (n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
Athena Diagnostics RCV000590691 SCV000841701 uncertain significance not provided 2020-09-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000590691 SCV001090283 likely benign not provided 2023-09-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001109961 SCV001267345 benign Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss 2017-04-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001109962 SCV001267346 uncertain significance Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A 2017-04-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001109963 SCV001267347 uncertain significance Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A 2017-04-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories RCV000590691 SCV001474310 likely benign not provided 2022-12-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Neurogenetic Laboratory, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University RCV001109963 SCV001571590 uncertain significance Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A 2021-03-30 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneDx RCV000590691 SCV001822703 uncertain significance not provided 2024-08-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25401782, 34062854)
Revvity Omics, Revvity RCV000590691 SCV003816812 uncertain significance not provided 2020-05-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center RCV000590691 SCV001809389 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ RCV000590691 SCV001956503 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center RCV000590691 SCV001974283 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004532756 SCV004729408 likely benign GJB2-related disorder 2020-04-27 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.