ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_004004.6(GJB2):c.506G>A (p.Cys169Tyr)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00001  dbSNP: rs774518779
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 7
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000256090 SCV000322423 pathogenic not provided 2022-06-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect as the p.(C169Y) variant results in disruption of junction channel formation, and disrupts the disulfide bridge that typically forms between the C169 and C64 residues (Zonta et al., 2015); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24551843, 25388846, 15365987, 34354426, 22103400, 25628337)
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000587164 SCV000698263 pathogenic Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A 2017-06-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: The GJB2 c.506G>A (p.Cys169Tyr) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. "Cys169 is one of the six extracellular cysteine residues which are conserved in all connexin isoforms. These six cysteines form three disulfide bridges, which are likely to play an important role in guiding the correct folding of the connexin protein and the docking of the two hexameric hemichannels in the extracellular region" via Zonta_2015. 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome. A functional study, Zonta_2015 supports these predictions and showed that the variant "At the cellular level, our results show that the mutant protein fails to form junctional channels in HeLa transfectants despite being correctly targeted to the plasma membrane. At the molecular level, this effect can be accounted for by disruption of the disulfide bridge that Cys169 forms with Cys64 in the wild-type structure (Cx26WT)." This variant was found in 2/121012 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000165, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic GJB2 variant (0.025). Multiple publications have cited the variant in homozygous affected individuals, in addition a heterozygous affected individual, which a second mutation was not indicated to have been found. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as pathogenic. Taken together, this variant is classified as pathogenic.
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV000763322 SCV000893999 pathogenic Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A; Mutilating keratoderma; Ichthyosis, hystrix-like, with hearing loss; Autosomal dominant keratitis-ichthyosis-hearing loss syndrome; Palmoplantar keratoderma-deafness syndrome; Knuckle pads, deafness AND leukonychia syndrome; Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 3A; X-linked mixed hearing loss with perilymphatic gusher 2018-10-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Genetic Diagnostics Department, Viafet Genomics Laboratory RCV000587164 SCV001976447 pathogenic Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A 2021-08-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing As part of Carrier Screening testing performed at Viafet Genomics Laboratory, this variant was identified in a heterozygous state in 2 family members who are not affected with this condition. This variant has been identified in a homozygous state in several patients affected with hearing loss (PMIDs: 24551843 and 25628337). In addition, functional studies have revealed that this variant fails to form junctional channels in vitro despite being correctly targeted to the plasma membrane (PMID: 25628337).
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV004017573 SCV004847924 pathogenic Rare genetic deafness 2022-06-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.Cys169Tyr variant in GJB2 has been reported in three homozygous and two heterozygous individuals with hearing loss and segregated with disease in seven affected individuals from three families (Zonta 2015 PMID: 25628337, Birkenhäger 2014 PMID: 24551843, Azaiez 2004 PMID: 15365987, Mahfood 2021 PMID: 34354426). It has also been identified in 0.00176% (2/113464) of European chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) and reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 265481). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogenicity. This variant disrupts one of six conserved cysteine residues that form intramolecular disulfide bonds and are critical for intercellular channel formation (Zonta 2015 PMID: 25628337, Birkenhäger 2014 PMID: 24551843, Dahl 1991 PMID: 1707811). In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that this variant impacts protein function by obliterating the formation of gap junction plaques at points of cell-to-cell contact (Zonta 2015 PMID: 25628337); however, these types of assays may not accurately represent biological function. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic for autosomal recessive hearing loss. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PP1_Strong; PM1; PM3; PM2_Supporting; PP3; PS3_Supporting.
Natera, Inc. RCV000587164 SCV001463363 pathogenic Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A 2020-09-16 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center RCV000587164 SCV004806831 uncertain significance Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 1A 2024-03-26 flagged submission clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.