Total submissions: 8
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000207517 | SCV000057217 | pathogenic | not provided | 2023-12-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Missense variants in this gene are a common cause of disease and they are underrepresented in the general population; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22824468, 23505473, 18456719, 34184824, 18413255, 23093928, 16474404, 18042262, 19376813, 24803665, 16439621, 30462361, 31560489, 32369273, 28404629) |
Molecular Diagnostics Lab, |
RCV000207517 | SCV000263063 | likely pathogenic | not provided | 2015-07-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000779848 | SCV000916701 | likely pathogenic | RASopathy | 2018-04-09 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: BRAF c.1495A>G (p.Lys499Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 246384 control chromosomes (in gnomAD and publication data). c.1495A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome (Rodriguez-Viciana 2006, Niihori 2006, Schulz 2008). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. Two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, and both of them demonstrated an increased kinase activity for the variant protein (Rodriguez-Viciana 2006, Niihori 2006). Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely pathogenic. |
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, |
RCV001813210 | SCV002060606 | pathogenic | Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome | 2016-12-12 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
3billion | RCV000015010 | SCV002521581 | pathogenic | Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 | 2022-05-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Amino acid change identical t o known pathogenic variant has been previously reported with established evidence (ClinVar ID: VCV000013976, PMID:16474404). Different pathogenic amino acid change has been reported with sufficient evidence at the same codon (ClinVar ID: VCV000040371,VCV000040372, PMID:18042262). The variant is located in a well-established functional domain or exonic hotspot, where pathogenic variants have frequently reported. In silico prediction tools and conservation analysis predicted that this variant was probably damaging to the protein structure/function (REVEL: 0.829>=0.6). A missense variant is a common mechanism associated with Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. It is absent from the gnomAD v2.1.1 dataset. ATherefore, this variant is classified as pathogenic according to the recommendation of ACMG/AMP guideline. |
Laboratory of Medical Genetics, |
RCV000015010 | SCV002577539 | pathogenic | Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 | 2021-11-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5 |
OMIM | RCV000015010 | SCV000035266 | pathogenic | Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 | 2006-03-01 | no assertion criteria provided | literature only | |
Genome |
RCV000015010 | SCV001156341 | not provided | Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 | no assertion provided | phenotyping only | Variant interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 02-12-2018 by Lab or GTR ID Kaizer Franz Josef Hospital. GenomeConnect-CFC International assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. |