ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_004333.6(BRAF):c.721A>C (p.Thr241Pro)

dbSNP: rs387906661
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 11
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000211752 SCV000061618 pathogenic Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome 2012-06-26 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The Thr241Pro variant in BRAF has been reported in the literature in four indivi duals with clinical features of Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome, LEOPARD, or Cos tello syndrome (Nava 2007, Schulz 2008, Sarkozy 2009). This variant was reported to have occurred de novo in three of those individuals. Therefore, this variant meets our criteria to be classified as pathogenic.
Molecular Diagnostics Lab, Nemours Children's Health, Delaware RCV000207516 SCV000263060 likely pathogenic not provided 2015-07-23 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV000515363 SCV000611251 pathogenic Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1; Lung carcinoma; Noonan syndrome 1; LEOPARD syndrome 3; Noonan syndrome 7 2017-05-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Invitae RCV000654966 SCV000776876 pathogenic RASopathy 2021-04-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. This variant disrupts the p.The241Met amino acid residue in BRAF. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 19206169). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects BRAF protein function (PMID: 28404629). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt BRAF protein function. This variant has been observed in individual(s) with cardio–facio–cutaneous syndrome (PMID: 17704260, 18042262). In at least one individual the variant was observed to be de novo. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 29807). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces threonine with proline at codon 241 of the BRAF protein (p.Thr241Pro). The threonine residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between threonine and proline.
Blueprint Genetics RCV000207516 SCV000927223 pathogenic not provided 2017-04-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000211752 SCV002500556 pathogenic Cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome 2022-03-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: BRAF c.721A>C (p.Thr241Pro) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Cysteine-rich (CRD) domain (Sarkozy_2009) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 248524 control chromosomes. c.721A>C has been reported in the literature as a sporadic/de-novo variant in individuals affected with Cardiofaciocutaneous Syndrome/Leopard Syndrome (example, Nava_2007, Schulz_2008, Sarkozy_2009, Sekiguchi_2013). These data indicate that the variant is likely to be associated with disease. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. The most pronounced variant effect results in a moderate level of activation as measured by NIH-3T3 colony focus formation and a moderate increase in MEK and ERK phosphorylation in-vitro (example, Sarkozy_2009). Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as pathogenic.
MGZ Medical Genetics Center RCV002288517 SCV002579800 pathogenic Noonan syndrome 7 2022-01-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
OMIM RCV000022680 SCV000043969 pathogenic Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1 2009-04-01 no assertion criteria provided literature only
OMIM RCV000022681 SCV000043970 pathogenic LEOPARD syndrome 3 2009-04-01 no assertion criteria provided literature only
GeneReviews RCV000055896 SCV000086904 not provided Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines no assertion provided literature only
GenomeConnect - CFC International RCV001089761 SCV001245255 not provided Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 1; LEOPARD syndrome 3; Noonan syndrome 7 no assertion provided phenotyping only Variant interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 08-30-2016 by Lab or GTR ID 500105. GenomeConnect-CFC International assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.