ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2512A>G (p.Ser838Gly)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00011  dbSNP: rs121964872
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 21
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel RCV003328149 SCV000864627 likely benign CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome 2023-08-17 reviewed by expert panel curation The c.2512A>G (p.Ser838Gly) variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2.
GeneDx RCV001719696 SCV000149766 likely benign not provided 2019-06-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In-silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, are inconsistent in their assessment as to whether or not the variant is damaging; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25801821, 29929997, 30374176, 8075649, 22470475, 25980754, 19139070, 10671552, 26674224, 27616075, 28993866, 9823469, 28767289, 31159747)
Ambry Genetics RCV000115857 SCV000183966 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-11-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Invitae RCV000198450 SCV000254825 likely benign Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2024-01-24 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Counsyl RCV000198450 SCV000487808 uncertain significance Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2015-11-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000212390 SCV000698387 likely benign not specified 2022-12-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: CDH1 c.2512A>G (p.Ser838Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Cadherin, cytoplasmic domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.4e-05 in 273974 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publication), predominantly at a frequency of 9.7e-05 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5 fold of our internal estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (2.1e-05), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. However, this frequency does not exceed the allele frequency threshold of 0.001 set by the ClinGen CDH1 variant curation expert panel (Lee_2018). c.2512A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer, including breast cancer, Lynch syndrome-associated cancer and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (examples: Hauke_2018, Shindo_2017, Tung_2015, Yurgelun_2015, Schubert_2019). In one study, the variant was detected in an unaffected female proband (45 years old) from a BRCA1-positive ( c.1016dupA, p.Val340fsX6) family with a history of breast and ovarian cancer (Stuebs_2018). In another study, 5 individuals older than 55 were reported in one family who had the variant but did not have gastric cancer, and only one had breast cancer (Tsai_2019). Another co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant has been reported in our internal database (BRCA2 c.6025C>T, p.Gln2009X), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Furthermore, the variant of interest was detected in 2 women in the FLOSSIES database older than age 70 years who have never had cancer, providing further supporting evidence for a benign role. Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories and one expert panel (ClinGen CDH1 variant curation expert panel) have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=6, likely benign n=7). The expert panel has re-classified this variant as likely benign since its previous evaluation by our laboratory. Based on the evidence outlined above, as all ascertained evidence supports a likely benign outcome in accordance with the proposed CDH1-expert panel conclusion, the variant was classified as likely benign.
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington RCV000198450 SCV000788250 likely benign Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2018-05-26 criteria provided, single submitter research The CDH1 variant designated as NM_004360.3:c.2512A>G (p.Ser838Gly) is classified as likely benign in the context of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome (Hansford 2015, PMID:26182300). This variant was identified or imputed in several family members age 65 or older who have not had gastric cancer or lobular breast cancer. This variant is listed in population databases (rs121964872) and is found in approximately 1 out of 9000 individuals of European ancestry (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). This variant is predicted to be tolerated by in silico prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD). Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID:29300386) gives about 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to cause hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. A smaller increase in cancer risk that the risk reported in the literature due to this variant cannot be entirely excluded. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study.
GeneKor MSA RCV000115857 SCV000821975 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2018-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV000115857 SCV000910736 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2015-12-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000198450 SCV001140155 benign Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2023-08-22 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000198450 SCV001274534 uncertain significance Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2017-04-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center RCV001253384 SCV001429064 uncertain significance Familial cancer of breast 2018-09-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden RCV001719696 SCV002009853 uncertain significance not provided 2021-11-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Sema4, Sema4 RCV000115857 SCV002529144 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2020-10-12 criteria provided, single submitter curation
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV002490358 SCV002799939 likely benign Familial cancer of breast; Blepharocheilodontic syndrome 1; Endometrial carcinoma; Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma; Neoplasm of ovary; Malignant tumor of prostate 2021-09-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto RCV000198450 SCV003926957 likely benign Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2022-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing BS2 (PMID: 30311375)
Myriad Genetics, Inc. RCV000198450 SCV004020042 uncertain significance Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma 2023-03-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk.
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV001719696 SCV004140036 likely benign not provided 2023-05-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing CDH1: BP4, BS2
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano RCV001719696 SCV004220825 likely benign not provided 2022-08-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003944817 SCV004765348 likely benign CDH1-related disorder 2020-11-05 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
OMIM RCV000013020 SCV000033265 pathogenic Neoplasm of ovary 1994-05-01 no assertion criteria provided literature only

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.