ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_004589.4(SCO1):c.16C>G (p.Leu6Val)

dbSNP: rs61753148
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 10
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
GeneDx RCV000128008 SCV000171598 benign not specified 2014-04-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics RCV000224328 SCV000280709 likely benign not provided 2015-08-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Converted during submission to Likely benign.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000273401 SCV000400563 uncertain significance Mitochondrial complex IV deficiency, nuclear type 1 2016-06-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000273401 SCV000400564 uncertain significance Mitochondrial complex IV deficiency, nuclear type 1 2016-06-14 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000330754 SCV000400565 uncertain significance Leigh syndrome 2018-01-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000224328 SCV000493162 likely benign not provided 2024-08-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing SCO1: BP4, BS2
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV000224328 SCV001094657 benign not provided 2024-01-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000128008 SCV004020987 uncertain significance not specified 2023-06-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: SCO1 c.16C>G (p.Leu6Val) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0036 in 248192 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. c.16C>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Mitochondrial Complex 4 Deficiency without evidence for causality (e.g. McCormack_2016, Kumps_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Mitochondrial Complex 4 Deficiency, Nuclear Type 4. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33340101; Book Chapter: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800877-5.00021-8). Four ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: one classified the variant as uncertain significance, two as likely benign, and one as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic RCV000224328 SCV000802734 uncertain significance not provided 2016-02-22 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV000224328 SCV001552024 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The SCO1 p.Leu6Val variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61753148), ClinVar (reported as benign, likely benign and uncertain significance), Clinvitae, MutDB and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 1015 of 279580 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.00363 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 818 of 126916 chromosomes (freq: 0.006445), Other in 25 of 7176 chromosomes (freq: 0.003484), Latino in 93 of 35346 chromosomes (freq: 0.002631), African in 39 of 24464 chromosomes (freq: 0.001594), South Asian in 26 of 30522 chromosomes (freq: 0.000852), European (Finnish) in 10 of 25074 chromosomes (freq: 0.000399), East Asian in 3 of 19798 chromosomes (freq: 0.000152), and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10284 chromosomes (freq: 0.000097). The p.Leu6 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.