Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fulgent Genetics, |
RCV002486476 | SCV002775344 | uncertain significance | Autosomal recessive multiple pterygium syndrome; Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome | 2022-03-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV002547599 | SCV003688473 | uncertain significance | Inborn genetic diseases | 2022-11-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.1012T>C (p.S338P) alteration is located in exon 9 (coding exon 9) of the CHRNG gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1012, causing the serine (S) at amino acid position 338 to be replaced by a proline (P). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001354962 | SCV001549697 | uncertain significance | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The CHRNG p.Ser338Pro variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in ClinVar, Cosmic, or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs776733115) and in control databases in 24 of 282666 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000085 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 23 of 129076 chromosomes (freq: 0.000178) and Other in 1 of 7220 chromosomes (freq: 0.000139); it was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), and South Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The p.Ser338 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, and MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. |