Total submissions: 2
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001360826 | SCV001556773 | uncertain significance | Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F; Cockayne syndrome; Fanconi anemia complementation group Q | 2023-11-24 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 624 of the ERCC4 protein (p.Arg624Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs180919656, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ERCC4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1052608). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt ERCC4 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
St. |
RCV004789544 | SCV005402103 | uncertain significance | Fanconi anemia complementation group Q | 2024-06-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The ERCC4 c.1871G>A (p.Arg624Gln) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.044% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia or xeroderma pigmentosum. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. |