ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2647G>A (p.Glu883Lys)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00012  dbSNP: rs201652412
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Invitae RCV000864380 SCV001005171 likely benign Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F; Cockayne syndrome; Fanconi anemia complementation group Q 2024-01-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Mendelics RCV000989536 SCV001139956 likely benign Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F 2019-05-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV000989536 SCV001275988 likely benign Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F 2018-01-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.
Sema4, Sema4 RCV002259039 SCV002537952 likely benign Xeroderma pigmentosum 2021-08-06 criteria provided, single submitter curation
Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University RCV003153877 SCV003843331 benign Ovarian cancer 2022-01-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV001358163 SCV004141175 likely benign not provided 2023-10-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing ERCC4: BP4, BS2
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003938256 SCV004752970 likely benign ERCC4-related disorder 2022-04-06 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV001358163 SCV001553829 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The ERCC4 p.Glu883Lys variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in ClinVar or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs201652412) and in control databases in 134 of 268246 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0004995 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 90 of 30526 chromosomes (freq: 0.002948), Other in 5 of 6702 chromosomes (freq: 0.000746), Ashkenazi Jewish in 6 of 9858 chromosomes (freq: 0.000609), European (non-Finnish) in 31 of 118102 chromosomes (freq: 0.000263) and Latino in 2 of 35108 chromosomes (freq: 0.000057), but was not observed in the African, East Asian, or European (Finnish) populations. The p.Glu883 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.