Total submissions: 2
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invitae | RCV000693705 | SCV000821586 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-10-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, with tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 102 of the RAD50 protein (p.Cys102Tyr). This variant is present in population databases (rs573712823, gnomAD 0.04%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAD50-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 572345). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt RAD50 protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. RNA analysis performed to evaluate the impact of this missense change on mRNA splicing indicates it does not significantly alter splicing (Invitae). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000693705 | SCV001179590 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-02-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.C102Y variant (also known as c.305G>A), located in coding exon 3 of the RAD50 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 305. The cysteine at codon 102 is replaced by tyrosine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |