Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000781785 | SCV000920111 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2018-05-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: RAD50 c.3390-5T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was absent in 246092 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.3390-5T>C in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001430664 | SCV001633407 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-06-17 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV001430664 | SCV005023909 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2023-11-20 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.3390-5T>C intronic variant results from a T to C substitution 5 nucleotides upstream from coding exon 22 in the RAD50 gene. This nucleotide position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration may result in the creation or strengthening of a novel splice acceptor site. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |