ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_006019.4(TCIRG1):c.2445C>T (p.Gly815=)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00022  dbSNP: rs150788130
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 6
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) RCV000381461 SCV000342256 uncertain significance not provided 2016-07-07 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000381461 SCV000891982 likely benign not provided 2022-09-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing TCIRG1: BP4, BP7
Invitae RCV000381461 SCV001106097 likely benign not provided 2024-01-19 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001113576 SCV001271360 uncertain significance Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis 1 2018-01-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.
Natera, Inc. RCV001113576 SCV001452921 uncertain significance Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis 1 2020-01-24 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System RCV000381461 SCV001552368 uncertain significance not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The TCIRG1 p.Gly599Gly variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs150788130) and in ClinVar (classified as a VUS by EGL Genetics and Praxis fuer Humangenetik Tuebingen). The variant was also identified in control databases in 91 of 282564 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.000322 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017) and was observed in the following populations: Other in 9 of 7222 chromosomes (freq: 0.001246), European (Finnish) in 18 of 24946 chromosomes (freq: 0.000722), Latino in 21 of 35430 chromosomes (freq: 0.000593), European (non-Finnish) in 35 of 129092 chromosomes (freq: 0.000271), African in 6 of 24946 chromosomes (freq: 0.000241), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10364 chromosomes (freq: 0.000096) and East Asian in 1 of 19948 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), while the variant was not observed in the South Asian population. The p.Gly599Gly variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. However, 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs, (MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict the creation of a new 5' splice site; this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.