Total submissions: 25
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharm |
RCV001787325 | SCV000268326 | drug response | simvastatin response - Toxicity | 2021-04-07 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787324 | SCV000268328 | drug response | rosuvastatin response - Metabolism/PK | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 2A: Variants in Level 2A clinical annotations are found in PharmGKB’s Tier 1 Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIPs). These variants are in known pharmacogenes, implying causation of drug phenotype is more likely. These clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations with a moderate level of evidence supporting the association. For example, the association may be found in multiple cohorts, but there may be a minority of studies that do not support the majority assertion. Level 2A clinical annotations must be supported by at least two independent publications. |
Pharm |
RCV001787333 | SCV000494712 | drug response | hmg coa reductase inhibitors response - Toxicity | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 2A: Variants in Level 2A clinical annotations are found in PharmGKB’s Tier 1 Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIPs). These variants are in known pharmacogenes, implying causation of drug phenotype is more likely. These clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations with a moderate level of evidence supporting the association. For example, the association may be found in multiple cohorts, but there may be a minority of studies that do not support the majority assertion. Level 2A clinical annotations must be supported by at least two independent publications. |
Pharm |
RCV000660832 | SCV000783071 | drug response | simvastatin acid response - Metabolism/PK | 2021-03-24 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 2A: Variants in Level 2A clinical annotations are found in PharmGKB’s Tier 1 Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIPs). These variants are in known pharmacogenes, implying causation of drug phenotype is more likely. These clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations with a moderate level of evidence supporting the association. For example, the association may be found in multiple cohorts, but there may be a minority of studies that do not support the majority assertion. Level 2A clinical annotations must be supported by at least two independent publications. |
Pharm |
RCV001787819 | SCV002031254 | drug response | atorvastatin response - Metabolism/PK | 2022-02-15 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV001787820 | SCV002031255 | drug response | atorvastatin response - Toxicity | 2021-04-07 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227613 | SCV003925511 | drug response | fluvastatin response - Metabolism/PK | 2022-02-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227614 | SCV003925512 | drug response | fluvastatin response - Toxicity | 2022-02-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227615 | SCV003925513 | drug response | lovastatin acid response - Metabolism/PK | 2022-02-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227616 | SCV003925515 | drug response | lovastatin response - Metabolism/PK | 2022-02-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227617 | SCV003925516 | drug response | lovastatin response - Toxicity | 2022-02-15 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227618 | SCV003925517 | drug response | pitavastatin response - Metabolism/PK | 2022-02-15 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227619 | SCV003925518 | drug response | pravastatin response - Toxicity | 2022-02-15 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227620 | SCV003925519 | drug response | rosuvastatin response - Toxicity | 2022-02-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Pharm |
RCV003227621 | SCV003925520 | drug response | simvastatin response - Metabolism/PK | 2022-02-14 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | PharmGKB Level of Evidence 1A: Level 1A clinical annotations describe variant-drug combinations that have variant-specific prescribing guidance available in a current clinical guideline annotation or an FDA-approved drug label annotation. Annotations of drug labels or clinical guidelines must give prescribing guidance for specific variants (e.g. CYP2C9*3, HLA-B*57:01) or provide mapping from defined allele functions to diplotypes and phenotypes to be used as supporting evidence for a level 1A clinical annotation. Level 1A clinical annotations must also be supported by at least one publication in addition to a clinical guideline or drug label with variant-specific prescribing guidance. |
Eurofins Ntd Llc |
RCV000325818 | SCV000331343 | other | not provided | 2015-07-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV000311457 | SCV000377358 | benign | Rotor syndrome | 2018-03-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. |
ARUP Laboratories, |
RCV000311457 | SCV000605180 | benign | Rotor syndrome | 2023-11-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV000325818 | SCV000977587 | benign | not provided | 2018-03-14 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. |
Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV000311457 | SCV000733149 | benign | Rotor syndrome | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Difficult and Complicated Liver Diseases and Artificial Liver Center, |
RCV000999565 | SCV001156261 | pathogenic | Gilbert syndrome | 2019-05-01 | no assertion criteria provided | case-control | |
Clinical Genetics, |
RCV001705611 | SCV001918782 | benign | not specified | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, |
RCV001705611 | SCV001951542 | benign | not specified | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, |
RCV001705611 | SCV001978021 | benign | not specified | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Prevention |
RCV003982852 | SCV004796071 | likely benign | SLCO1B1-related disorder | 2021-07-21 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). |