Total submissions: 34
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evidence- |
RCV000083197 | SCV001161511 | benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2019-06-18 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 6.81E-11 |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000048292 | SCV000076305 | benign | Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome | 2025-02-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV000679692 | SCV000108670 | likely benign | not provided | 2021-03-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10528853, 21965345, 22516946, 18375895, 26332594, 27495310, 23867111, 25637381, 21520273, 21702907, 24055113, 24728327, 16685647, 26727311, 11979449, 11149413, 20104584, 27616075, 33087888) |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000131695 | SCV000186731 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2014-11-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
CSER _CC_NCGL, |
RCV000148395 | SCV000190094 | likely benign | Breast and/or ovarian cancer | 2014-06-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | |
Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, |
RCV000083197 | SCV000195924 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2015-04-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Vantari Genetics | RCV000131695 | SCV000267005 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2015-11-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000048292 | SCV000494417 | benign | Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome | 2015-11-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant Summary: The BRCA1 c.3708T>G variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in amino acid change from Asn to Lys. 3/4 in-silico tools predict this variant to be benign. The composite observed allele frequency in controls, including the large and diverse ExAC cohort, is 29/121594 (1/4193); and the observed allele frequency in the Latino sub-population from ExAC population is 11/11570 (1/1052). These frequencies are not significantly different than the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (1/1000). However, the low frequency in control populations should still suggest that this variant is a rare polymorphism unless proven other. The variant has been cited to co-occur with various pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, including BRCA1 c.6944_6947delTAAA (p.Ile2315_Lys2316?fs), BRCA1 c.2722G>T (p.Glu908Ter), and BRCA2 c.8537_8538delAG (p.Glu2846Glyfs) from BIC and BRCA2 c.1310_1313delAAGA (p.Lys437IlefsX22) from UMD. These co-occurrence findings are a clear evidence that this variant is benign. Although the variant has been reported in multiple patients in the literature, the publications did not comprehensively rule out the presence of large rearrangements. LOH studies demonstrated the retention of wild type allele and the loss of the allele harboring this variant in tumors from 2 patients, further supporting a benign outcome (Osorio et al, 2002). In addition, a cell growth assay to measure this variant's ability to functionally complement BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells showed the variant behaves like wildtype (Bouwman et al, 2013). Although clinical laboratories and databases are mixed in their classifications, the majority classify the variant as benign/likely benign/neutral. Taken together, this variant has been classified as benign. |
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, |
RCV000120300 | SCV000538452 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2016-06-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ClinVar: 4 B/LB, 3 VUS |
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, |
RCV000120300 | SCV000588047 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2017-04-20 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Genetic Services Laboratory, |
RCV000120300 | SCV000593670 | likely benign | not specified | 2017-05-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, |
RCV000083197 | SCV000743404 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2017-07-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, |
RCV000083197 | SCV000744629 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2017-05-31 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Prevention |
RCV000679692 | SCV000806939 | likely benign | not provided | 2017-07-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Institute for Genomic Medicine |
RCV000120300 | SCV000864296 | likely benign | not specified | 2017-10-24 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | BP1, BP4, BP6; This alteration is a missense alteration in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease, is predicted to be tolerated by multiple functional prediction tools, and was reported as a benign/likely benign alteration by a reputable source (ClinVar or other correspondence from a clinical testing laboratory). |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000131695 | SCV000902607 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2015-08-13 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Mendelics | RCV000083197 | SCV001140546 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2019-05-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
ARUP Laboratories, |
RCV000679692 | SCV001156768 | benign | not provided | 2023-10-09 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV000148395 | SCV001333183 | likely benign | Breast and/or ovarian cancer | 2023-04-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Genetics Program, |
RCV000048292 | SCV002515203 | likely benign | Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome | 2021-11-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | research | |
Sema4, |
RCV000131695 | SCV002538231 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-07-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | |
Center for Genomic Medicine, |
RCV000120300 | SCV002760935 | benign | not specified | 2025-03-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Fulgent Genetics, |
RCV002477170 | SCV002796176 | likely benign | Familial cancer of breast; Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1; Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4; Fanconi anemia, complementation group S | 2021-11-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ce |
RCV000679692 | SCV004140626 | benign | not provided | 2024-11-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | BRCA1: BP1, BP4, BS1, BS2 |
ITMI | RCV000120300 | SCV000084452 | not provided | not specified | 2013-09-19 | no assertion provided | reference population | |
Sharing Clinical Reports Project |
RCV000083197 | SCV000115271 | benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2012-05-01 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | |
Breast Cancer Information Core |
RCV000083197 | SCV000144842 | uncertain significance | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2002-05-29 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | |
Department of Medical Genetics, |
RCV000083197 | SCV000301434 | uncertain significance | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2016-05-01 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | |
Research Molecular Genetics Laboratory, |
RCV000120300 | SCV000587335 | not provided | not specified | 2014-01-31 | no assertion provided | research | |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001353574 | SCV000591464 | benign | Malignant tumor of breast | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The BRCA1 p.Asn1236Lys variant has been previously reported in the literature in 11 of 5896 proband chromosomes with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and was identified in 3 of 1510 control chromosomes included in these studies (Borg 2010, Diez 2003, Lara 2012, Osorio 2007, Simard 2007, Spurdle 2008, Weber 2006). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs28897687), the GeneInsight COGR database (classified as with unknown significance by four clinical labs, and as likely benign by one clinical lab), ARUP Laboratories BRCA database (classified with uncertain significance), BIC database (35x with uncertain significance), LOVD, the ClinVar database (classified as having “uncertain significance” by three submitters; as “likely benign” by one submitter; and as “benign” by three submitters). The variant was also in 39 samples submitted to UMD, where it was classified as “neutral”. One of these samples had a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.1310_1313delAAGA, p.Lys437IlefsX22), increasing the likelihood that the p.Asn1236Lys variant may not have clinical significance. In addition, the variant was identified at polymorphic frequencies in three HapMap populations: Han Chinese in Beijing (freq: 0.026), Japanese in Tokyo (freq: 0.012), and Toscans in Italy (freq: 0.011). The variant is not conserved in all mammals, and the variant amino acid Lys is present in purple sea urchin, increasing the likelihood that this amino acid position may not be functionally important. Computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. A study using a multifactorial-likelihood ratio model (co-occurrence, pathology and conservation) yielded inconclusive results for the classification of this variant (Spurdle 2008). One functional study found that the variant did not affect BRCA1 interstrand crosslink repair (Bouwman 2013), and another study using a minigene assay found that the variant did not affect normal splicing of the BRCA1 gene (Anczuków 2008 in Walker 2013). In addition, loss of heterozygosity analysis of tumours in two patients showed retention of the wild-type allele and loss of the allele in which the variant was located, confirming that the variant was not deleterious (Osorio 2002). In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. | |
Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV000083197 | SCV000733622 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, |
RCV000679692 | SCV001905706 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, |
RCV000679692 | SCV001957821 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
BRCAlab, |
RCV000083197 | SCV004244031 | benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2020-03-02 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing |