Total submissions: 12
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evidence- |
RCV000112529 | SCV000244387 | benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2015-08-10 | reviewed by expert panel | curation | IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000517 |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001088955 | SCV000252820 | benign | Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome | 2024-12-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV000586580 | SCV000512316 | likely benign | not provided | 2019-03-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 17924331, 21990134, 22505045, 16267036, 15829246, 30209399) |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000580334 | SCV000683262 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2017-03-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000586580 | SCV000699210 | benign | not provided | 2016-05-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: The c.5153-13A>G variant affects a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. Mutation taster predicts benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 in silico tools via Alamut predict this variant does not affect RNA splicing sites. Functional study showed that this variant does not affect splicing (Houdayer_BRCA1&2_HM_2012). This variant is found in 3/119788 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000025, which does not exceed maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0010005). This variant has been reported in BrC/OvC patients without evidence for causality. BIC lists one co-occurrence of variant of interest and a pathogenic BRCA1 variant in trans (c.5266dupC/p.Gln1756Profs, also cited in Judkins_2005), further supporting neutrality of our variant of interest. In addition, multiple clinical laboratory/publications classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. |
Counsyl | RCV000112529 | SCV000785499 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2017-08-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV000112529 | SCV001287201 | uncertain significance | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Center for Genomic Medicine, |
RCV002267848 | SCV002550952 | benign | not specified | 2025-03-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000580334 | SCV002641071 | benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2014-11-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Breast Cancer Information Core |
RCV000112529 | SCV000145351 | uncertain significance | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | 1999-12-30 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | |
Brotman Baty Institute, |
RCV000112529 | SCV001243672 | not provided | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 | no assertion provided | in vitro | ||
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001358351 | SCV001554056 | likely benign | Malignant tumor of breast | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The BRCA1 c.5153-13A>G variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided (Easton 2007, Houdayer 2012, Judkins 2005, Lindor 2012). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs45471406) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, ENIGMA and Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America; as likely benign by GeneDx, Color and Counsyl; as uncertain significance by BIC), and in LOVD 3.0 (4x ). The variant was identified in control databases in 4 of 245430 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European in 3 of 111414 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and South Asian in 1 of 30776 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and Finnish, populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.5266dupC (Alias 5385insC) (p.Gln1756Profs)), increasing the likelihood that the c.5153-13A>G variant does not have clinical significance (Judkins 2005). In addition, several Multifactorial likelihood-ratio models showed the variant has odds in favor of neutrality 6799 and posterior probability of being deleterious 5.17√ó10‚à Ã5 (Easton 2007, Lindor 2012). In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. |