Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001055363 | SCV001219751 | uncertain significance | Immunodeficiency, common variable, 2 | 2022-08-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change falls in intron 1 of the TNFRSF13B gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the TNFRSF13B protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. This variant is present in population databases (rs374249932, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TNFRSF13B-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 851047). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Gene |
RCV002469333 | SCV002765411 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2022-12-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | In silico analysis supports a deleterious effect on splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
Clinical Genomics Laboratory, |
RCV001055363 | SCV005685319 | uncertain significance | Immunodeficiency, common variable, 2 | 2024-06-10 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The TNFRSF13B c.61+5G>A variant, to our knowledge, has not been reported in the medical literature but has been reported in the ClinVar database as a germline variant of uncertain significance by two submitters. This variant is only observed on 5/251,314 alleles in the general population (gnomAD v.2.1.1), indicating it is not a common variant. Computational predictors indicate that this variant would alter splicing, evidence that correlates to an impact of this variant on TNFRSF13B function. Additionally, other variants at this splice donor (c.61+2T>C, c.61+2T>A, c.61+1G>A, c.61+1G>T) are classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in ClinVar. Due to limited information, and based on ACMG/AMP guidelines for variant interpretation (Richards S et al., PMID: 25741868), the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain at this time. |