ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_014467.3(SRPX2):c.961+1G>A

gnomAD frequency: 0.00002  dbSNP: rs1303998333
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 3
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001345689 SCV001539826 uncertain significance Rolandic epilepsy, intellectual disability, and speech dyspraxia, X-linked 2020-03-17 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. The current clinical and genetic evidence is not sufficient to establish whether loss-of-function variants in SRPX2 cause disease. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site, but this prediction has not been confirmed by published transcriptional studies. This variant has been observed in individual(s) with autism spectrum disorder (PMID: 23352160). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change affects a donor splice site in intron 8 of the SRPX2 gene. It is expected to disrupt RNA splicing and likely results in an absent or disrupted protein product.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV001824954 SCV002074375 uncertain significance not specified 2022-01-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: SRPX2 c.961+1G>A alters a conserved nucleotide located in a canonical splice-site and is predicted to affect mRNA splicing resulting in a significantly altered protein due to either exon skipping, shortening, or inclusion of intronic material. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant abolishes the canonical 5' splicing donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was absent in 174130 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. Although c.961+1G>A has been reported in an individual with autism (example, Lim_2013), to our knowledge, no occurrence of c.961+1G>A in individuals affected with Rolandic Epilepsy With Mental Retardation And Speech Dyspraxia, X-Linked and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Subsequently the role of SRPX2 in the phenotype of Rolandic epilepsy has been disputed (Reinthaler_2014) while an association with autism is not fully established in the literature. One clinical diagnostic laboratory has submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 classified the variant as uncertain significance citing overlapping evidence utilized in the context of this evalution. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003416242 SCV004114937 uncertain significance SRPX2-related disorder 2023-01-18 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The SRPX2 c.961+1G>A variant is predicted to disrupt the GT donor site and interfere with normal splicing. This variant was reported in an individual with autism spectrum disorder (Table S7 - Lim et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23352160). This variant has not been reported in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.