Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001166303 | SCV001328670 | uncertain significance | Geleophysic dysplasia 1 | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV002558623 | SCV003724135 | uncertain significance | Inborn genetic diseases | 2022-06-10 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.1213G>A (p.E405K) alteration is located in exon 10 (coding exon 9) of the ADAMTSL2 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1213, causing the glutamic acid (E) at amino acid position 405 to be replaced by a lysine (K). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV003490095 | SCV004242046 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2023-12-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: ADAMTSL2 c.1213G>A (p.Glu405Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.4e-05 in 1542486 control chromosomes. This frequency does not allow for any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1213G>A in individuals affected with Geleophysic Dysplasia and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. |