ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_016277.5(RAB23):c.481+4A>C

Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 3
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV002904881 SCV003261319 uncertain significance Carpenter syndrome 2022-07-12 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change falls in intron 5 of the RAB23 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the RAB23 protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. This variant is present in population databases (rs747225405, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAB23-related conditions. Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV002904880 SCV003562231 uncertain significance Inborn genetic diseases 2021-12-21 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.481+4A>C intronic alteration consists of a A to C substitution nucleotides after coding exon 4 in the RAB23 gene. Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004744478 SCV005351063 uncertain significance RAB23-related disorder 2024-04-17 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing The RAB23 c.481+4A>C variant is predicted to interfere with splicing. This variant is predicted to cause a minor splicing defect at the consensus splice site based on splicing prediction programs (Alamut Visual Plus v1.6.1; Splice AI, Jaganathan et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 30661751). However, the use of computer prediction software is not equivalent to functional evidence. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.023% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. Of note, a c.481G>C variant which is also predicted to impact the same consensus splice site, has been reported in the homozygous state in a patient with Carpenter Syndrome and functional studies showed aberrant splicing with exon 6 skipping and premature protein termination (Haye et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25168863). At this time, the clinical significance of the c.481+4A>C variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.