Total submissions: 2
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000521935 | SCV000619578 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2017-07-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The E305K variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The E305K variant is not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). This variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals; however, missense variants in nearby residues have not been reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database in association with PLEKHG5-related disorders (Stenson et al., 2014). In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV002528238 | SCV003302402 | uncertain significance | Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal recessive 4; Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease recessive intermediate C | 2022-06-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 305 of the PLEKHG5 protein (p.Glu305Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs750943470, gnomAD 0.009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PLEKHG5-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 450944). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |