Total submissions: 6
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001161356 | SCV001323222 | likely benign | Osteoglophonic dysplasia | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001161357 | SCV001323223 | likely benign | Trigonocephaly 1 | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001161358 | SCV001323224 | likely benign | Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. |
Illumina Laboratory Services, |
RCV001161359 | SCV001323225 | likely benign | Craniosynostosis syndrome | 2017-04-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. |
Gene |
RCV001779123 | SCV002015685 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2021-10-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV003769772 | SCV004584922 | uncertain significance | Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 2 with or without anosmia; Pfeiffer syndrome | 2023-11-13 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 675 of the FGFR1 protein (p.Arg675Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs771078736, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with FGFR1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 909924). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on FGFR1 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |