Total submissions: 7
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurofins Ntd Llc |
RCV000595171 | SCV000705754 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2018-05-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Invitae | RCV000693115 | SCV000820970 | likely benign | Hajdu-Cheney syndrome | 2023-12-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Johns Hopkins Genomics, |
RCV000595171 | SCV001762345 | likely benign | not provided | 2021-07-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Prevention |
RCV003952977 | SCV004770952 | likely benign | NOTCH2-related condition | 2022-03-04 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV000595171 | SCV001549681 | uncertain significance | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The NOTCH2 p.Ala602Thr variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs140311741), LOVD 3.0 and in ClinVar (classified as a VUS for Hajdu-Cheney syndrome by Invitae and EGL Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 85 of 282500 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000301 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 78 of 128854 chromosomes (freq: 0.000605), Other in 2 of 7220 chromosomes (freq: 0.000277), African in 2 of 24964 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), Latino in 2 of 35430 chromosomes (freq: 0.000056) and European (Finnish) in 1 of 25124 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004); it was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and South Asian populations. The p.Ala602 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. | |
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, |
RCV000595171 | SCV001799161 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, |
RCV000595171 | SCV001952105 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing |