ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_024426.6(WT1):c.760C>T (p.Pro254Ser)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00022  dbSNP: rs2234584
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 18
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001081231 SCV000290759 benign Drash syndrome; Frasier syndrome; Wilms tumor 1; 11p partial monosomy syndrome 2025-02-03 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000122310 SCV000540678 uncertain significance not specified 2017-01-25 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Classified this year. The variant has been reported in 4 papers: 1 patient with wilms tumor but no second somatic mutation, 1 healthy indvidual, 1 with abnormal sex development, and one with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in which it was predicted to be VUS. It has been seen in 40/66282 alleles in ExAC (0.06%) (too high for disease/gene contribution?).
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001107940 SCV001265128 likely benign Wilms tumor 1 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001107941 SCV001265129 benign Meacham syndrome 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign.
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina RCV001107942 SCV001265130 likely benign Nephrotic syndrome, type 4 2017-04-27 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign.
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago RCV000122310 SCV002071507 uncertain significance not specified 2020-10-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing DNA sequence analysis of the WT1 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.760C>T, in exon 2 that results in an amino acid change, p.Pro254Ser. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.063% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs2234584). The p.Pro254Ser change has been identified in one individual with Wilm's tumor and another individual with 46,XY disorder of sexual development (PMIDs: 9108089, 21508141). The p.Pro254Ser change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the WT1 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Pro254Ser substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Pro254Ser change remains unknown at this time.
GeneDx RCV000782221 SCV002499792 likely benign not provided 2024-03-08 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria.
Sema4, Sema4 RCV002255305 SCV002530553 likely benign Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2021-11-05 criteria provided, single submitter curation
UNC Molecular Genetics Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill RCV002284191 SCV002573586 uncertain significance Microscopic hematuria 2022-02-15 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen RCV000782221 SCV003916708 likely benign not provided 2023-12-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing WT1: PM5:Supporting, PS4:Supporting, BP4, BS1
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000122310 SCV004222986 likely benign not specified 2025-01-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: WT1 c.760C>T (p.Pro254Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00052 in 1461804 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 55.97 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in WT1 causing Wilms Tumor, Type 1 phenotype (9.4e-06). c.760C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Wilms Tumor, amongts other phenotypes (ie: Schumacher_1997, etc). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Wilms Tumor, Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 9108089). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 135453). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health RCV003588578 SCV004360959 likely benign Nephroblastoma 2022-09-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV004965276 SCV005533816 benign Inborn genetic diseases 2024-09-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
ITMI RCV000122310 SCV000086540 not provided not specified 2013-09-19 no assertion provided reference population
Gharavi Laboratory, Columbia University RCV000782221 SCV000920708 uncertain significance not provided 2018-09-16 no assertion criteria provided research
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) RCV000782221 SCV001798259 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center RCV000782221 SCV001975371 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV004551194 SCV004774787 likely benign WT1-related disorder 2020-10-15 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.