Total submissions: 7
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000590184 | SCV000149975 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2021-10-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Observed in an individual with breast cancer (Decker 2017); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28779002) |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000116066 | SCV000186224 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2018-11-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001087089 | SCV000255076 | likely benign | Familial cancer of breast | 2024-01-05 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000590184 | SCV000699521 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2016-05-20 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: The c.1347A>G (p.Lys449=) in PALB2 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant enhance a cryptic donor splices site, however these predictions are yet to be confirmed by the functional studies. The variant is absent from the control population dataset of ExAC, suggesting that it is not a common polymorphism. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via published reports, but is cited as VUS/Likely Benign by reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Taking together, the variant was classified as VUS until more evidence becomes available. |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000116066 | SCV000903224 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2016-03-03 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Genetic Services Laboratory, |
RCV001818286 | SCV002065762 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2021-11-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV001356241 | SCV001551356 | uncertain significance | Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 3 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The PALB2 p.Lys449= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs587780205) as "With Uncertain significance allele" and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae and Ambry Genetics; as uncertain significance by GeneDx and Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America). The variant was identified in control databases in 1 of 245422 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the European population in 1 of 111034 chromosomes (freq: 0.000009), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Lys449= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. However, 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. |