Total submissions: 8
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambry Genetics | RCV000129677 | SCV000184476 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2020-06-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000799318 | SCV000938975 | likely benign | Familial cancer of breast | 2024-12-23 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000129677 | SCV001340936 | uncertain significance | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2020-05-12 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant inserts 1 nucleotide at +3 position in intron 5 of the PALB2 gene. Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. However, this prediction has not been confirmed in published RNA studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 3/249934 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | RCV001849925 | SCV002046276 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2024-08-25 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The PALB2 c.2514+3dup variant has not been reported in individuals with PALB2-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000012 (3/249934 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on splicing yielded predictions that this variant does not affect PALB2 mRNA splicing. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. |
Genetic Services Laboratory, |
RCV001800428 | SCV002071273 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2019-09-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV001849925 | SCV002107244 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2023-07-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV001800428 | SCV004100256 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2023-09-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
St. |
RCV000799318 | SCV005689195 | uncertain significance | Familial cancer of breast | 2024-07-09 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The PALB2 c.2514+3dup intronic change results in a duplication at the +3 position of intron 5 of the PALB2 gene. Algorithms that predict the impact of sequence changes on splicing indicate that this variant likely does not affect splicing, but to our knowledge these predictions have not been confirmed by RNA studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported as pathogenic in individuals with PALB2-associated conditions. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. |