Total submissions: 12
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambry Genetics | RCV000164145 | SCV000214761 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2014-11-26 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Invitae | RCV000195762 | SCV000253607 | likely benign | Familial cancer of breast | 2024-01-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Counsyl | RCV000195762 | SCV000487992 | likely benign | Familial cancer of breast | 2015-12-09 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Gene |
RCV000428315 | SCV000514015 | likely benign | not specified | 2017-04-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. |
Color Diagnostics, |
RCV000164145 | SCV000537512 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2015-12-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Prevention |
RCV000679774 | SCV000807117 | likely benign | not provided | 2017-07-07 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000428315 | SCV000917951 | likely benign | not specified | 2019-08-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Sema4, |
RCV000164145 | SCV002531231 | likely benign | Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome | 2021-01-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | curation | |
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, |
RCV003316018 | SCV004016507 | likely benign | Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 5 | 2023-07-07 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Myriad Genetics, |
RCV000195762 | SCV004019147 | benign | Familial cancer of breast | 2023-03-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. |
Center for Genomic Medicine, |
RCV000428315 | SCV004027095 | likely benign | not specified | 2023-08-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV000679774 | SCV001548663 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The PALB2 p.Tyr28= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs761533286) “With Likely benign allele” and ClinVar (classified likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, GeneDx, Counsyl, Color and Prevention Genetics). The variant was identified in control databases in 3 of 246264 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 33582 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003) and European Non-Finnish in 2 of 111714 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Tyr28= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. |