ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.3660G>T (p.Lys1220Asn)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00024  dbSNP: rs201982308
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 8
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) RCV000724196 SCV000229464 uncertain significance not provided 2017-11-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
GeneDx RCV000724196 SCV000564861 uncertain significance not provided 2021-12-29 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics RCV000763865 SCV000894799 uncertain significance Leber congenital amaurosis 10; Meckel syndrome, type 4; Senior-Loken syndrome 6; Joubert syndrome 5; Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 2018-10-31 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Invitae RCV000797414 SCV000936969 uncertain significance Familial aplasia of the vermis; Meckel-Gruber syndrome; Nephronophthisis 2022-11-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces lysine, which is basic and polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 1220 of the CEP290 protein (p.Lys1220Asn). This variant is present in population databases (rs201982308, gnomAD 0.05%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CEP290-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 196713). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt CEP290 protein function. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Provincial Medical Genetics Program of British Columbia, University of British Columbia RCV002054097 SCV002496403 uncertain significance Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 2022-01-01 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Ambry Genetics RCV003165371 SCV003865232 uncertain significance Inborn genetic diseases 2023-02-28 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The c.3660G>T (p.K1220N) alteration is located in exon 31 (coding exon 30) of the CEP290 gene. This alteration results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 3660, causing the lysine (K) at amino acid position 1220 to be replaced by an asparagine (N). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences RCV003430728 SCV004116556 uncertain significance CEP290-related condition 2023-12-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The CEP290 c.3660G>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Lys1220Asn. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.047% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
Natera, Inc. RCV001832016 SCV002094254 uncertain significance Leber congenital amaurosis 2020-02-21 no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.