Total submissions: 4
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, |
RCV002253128 | SCV002523301 | uncertain significance | See cases | 2019-10-18 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ACMG classification criteria: PM2 |
Department of Genetics, |
RCV003126206 | SCV003804045 | likely benign | Developmental disorder | 2022-09-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ambry Genetics | RCV004047384 | SCV004936083 | uncertain significance | Inborn genetic diseases | 2023-09-21 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.176A>G (p.Y59C) alteration is located in exon 3 (coding exon 1) of the RAI1 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 176, causing the tyrosine (Y) at amino acid position 59 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV005058186 | SCV005717679 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2024-10-21 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 59 of the RAI1 protein (p.Tyr59Cys). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAI1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1690710). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RAI1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |