ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_032043.3(BRIP1):c.3041G>A (p.Gly1014Asp)

dbSNP: rs876659757
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 2
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp RCV001338400 SCV001532061 uncertain significance Familial cancer of breast; Fanconi anemia complementation group J 2020-08-20 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This sequence change replaces glycine with aspartic acid at codon 1014 of the BRIP1 protein (p.Gly1014Asp). The glycine residue is weakly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between glycine and aspartic acid. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with BRIP1-related conditions. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The aspartic acid amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, suggesting that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. These predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Ambry Genetics RCV002447392 SCV002753972 uncertain significance Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome 2022-09-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing The p.G1014D variant (also known as c.3041G>A), located in coding exon 19 of the BRIP1 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 3041. The glycine at codon 1014 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.