Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eurofins Ntd Llc |
RCV000733924 | SCV000862029 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2018-06-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001855794 | SCV002129296 | uncertain significance | Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, musculocontractural type | 2021-11-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 80 of the CHST14 protein (p.Gly80Asp). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CHST14-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 597719). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The aspartic acid amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV003303223 | SCV004000762 | uncertain significance | Cardiovascular phenotype | 2023-04-07 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The p.G80D variant (also known as c.239G>A), located in coding exon 1 of the CHST14 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 239. The glycine at codon 80 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |