Total submissions: 10
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, |
RCV000041022 | SCV000064713 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2013-08-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The Lys4455Arg variant in TTN has been identified by our laboratory in 1 Caucasi an individual with LVNC and bidirectional VT and has been identified in 1/8588 E uropean American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.g s.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs142304137). Computational analyses are limited or unavailable for this variant. Additional information is needed to fully assess its clinical significance. |
Gene |
RCV000726846 | SCV000238116 | likely benign | not provided | 2019-03-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23476865) |
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, |
RCV000415195 | SCV000492708 | uncertain significance | Syncope; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | 2015-10-29 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Eurofins Ntd Llc |
RCV000726846 | SCV000703597 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2018-05-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Ce |
RCV000726846 | SCV001153134 | likely benign | not provided | 2022-07-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | TTN: BP4 |
Centre for Mendelian Genomics, |
RCV001198289 | SCV001369170 | uncertain significance | Tibial muscular dystrophy | 2016-01-01 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant was classified as: Uncertain significance. |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, |
RCV000726846 | SCV001552805 | uncertain significance | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | The TTN p.Lys4455Arg variant was identified in the literature, however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs142304137), ClinVar (conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity, associated with syncope and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; classified as Uncertain Significance by Laboratory for Molecular Medicine at Partners Healthcare, Centre for Mendelian Genomics at University Medical Centre Ljubljana, EGL Genetic Diagnostics and classified as Likely Benign by GeneDx), and LOVD 3.0. The variant was not identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in control databases in 110 of 280462 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000392 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: South Asian in 30 of 30546 chromosomes (freq: 0.000982), European (non-Finnish) in 62 of 128212 chromosomes (freq: 0.000484), Other in 3 of 7108 chromosomes (freq: 0.000422), Latino in 13 of 35210 chromosomes (freq: 0.000369), African in 2 of 24318 chromosomes (freq: 0.000082), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, and European (Finnish) populations. The variant was identified in a 5 year old asymptomatic female who presented with sinus bradycardia and was found to have exercise-induced bidirectional VT and a hypertrabeculated left ventricle (Egan_2013_PMID: 23476865). A pan cardiomyopathy microarray identified three missense variants in this individual: RYR2 p.Arg169Gln, CASQ2 p.Asp398del, and TTN p.Lys4455Arg (Egan_2013_PMID: 23476865). Four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing, specificically a decrease in 5’ splicing activity at the variant location. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. | |
Diagnostic Laboratory, |
RCV000726846 | SCV001743009 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, |
RCV000726846 | SCV001798696 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, |
RCV000726846 | SCV001955850 | likely benign | not provided | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing |