Total submissions: 3
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fulgent Genetics, |
RCV002486018 | SCV002777228 | uncertain significance | Polycystic kidney disease 4 | 2021-08-12 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001328216 | SCV003206589 | uncertain significance | Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease | 2022-07-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt PKHD1 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 988201). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PKHD1-related conditions. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces tyrosine, which is neutral and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 2784 of the PKHD1 protein (p.Tyr2784Cys). |
Sydney Genome Diagnostics, |
RCV001328216 | SCV001449400 | uncertain significance | Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease | 2018-07-24 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | This individual is heterozygous for the c.8351A>G variant in the PKHD1 gene. The variant has not been reported in any population databases (i.e. gnomAD, ExAC, ESP or dbSNP). To our knowledge, this variant has not been previously reported in the literature or any disease specific databases. In silico analysis of pathogenicity (through Alamut Visual v2.8.1) using PolyPhen2, SIFT and MutationTaster suggest that this variant is likely to be pathogenic. However, this analysis alone cannot be used to confirm pathogenicity. This variant is considered to be a variant of uncertain clinical significance (VOUS) according to the ACMG guidelines. |