Total submissions: 4
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV001769737 | SCV002004642 | likely benign | not provided | 2020-01-30 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
Ambry Genetics | RCV004671436 | SCV005166678 | uncertain significance | not specified | 2024-04-08 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.191C>T (p.P64L) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the SIX5 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 191, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 64 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
Fulgent Genetics, |
RCV005023248 | SCV005647951 | uncertain significance | Branchiootorenal syndrome 2 | 2024-05-28 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV001769737 | SCV005745046 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2025-01-19 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 64 of the SIX5 protein (p.Pro64Leu). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SIX5-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 1317730). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt SIX5 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |