ClinVar Miner

Submissions for variant NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.1776C>A (p.Asp592Glu)

gnomAD frequency: 0.00045  dbSNP: rs144182966
Minimum review status: Collection method:
Minimum conflict level:
ClinVar version:
Total submissions: 9
Download table as spreadsheet
Submitter RCV SCV Clinical significance Condition Last evaluated Review status Method Comment
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health RCV000170876 SCV000050764 likely benign not provided 2013-06-24 criteria provided, single submitter research
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington RCV000148451 SCV000190150 uncertain significance Brugada syndrome 2014-06-01 criteria provided, single submitter research Low GERP score may suggest that this variant may belong in a lower pathogenicity class
GeneDx RCV000185502 SCV000223431 likely benign not specified 2017-08-11 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.
Invitae RCV001087038 SCV000291909 likely benign Brugada syndrome 4 2023-12-10 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine RCV000185502 SCV000538565 uncertain significance not specified 2016-06-16 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency; Multiple papers classify as VUS; ClinVar: 1 LB, 2 VUS
Ambry Genetics RCV000619292 SCV000737851 likely benign Cardiovascular phenotype 2018-10-09 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp RCV000185502 SCV003922460 likely benign not specified 2023-03-13 criteria provided, single submitter clinical testing Variant summary: CACNB2 c.1614C>A (p.Asp538Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00044 in 251314 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 140 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CACNB2 causing Brugada Syndrome phenotype (3.1e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (likely benign n=3, VUS n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign.
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center RCV000170876 SCV001922668 likely benign not provided no assertion criteria provided clinical testing
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ RCV000185502 SCV001955928 benign not specified no assertion criteria provided clinical testing

The information on this website is not intended for direct diagnostic use or medical decision-making without review by a genetics professional. Individuals should not change their health behavior solely on the basis of information contained on this website. Neither the University of Utah nor the National Institutes of Health independently verfies the submitted information. If you have questions about the information contained on this website, please see a health care professional.