Total submissions: 9
Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene |
RCV000124110 | SCV000167519 | benign | not specified | 2014-01-16 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. |
Labcorp Genetics |
RCV000206606 | SCV000259569 | benign | Brugada syndrome 4 | 2025-02-02 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, |
RCV000585972 | SCV000700054 | benign | not provided | 2016-01-13 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Variant summary: The c.1623C>T variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 in silico tools via Alamut predict no significant effect on splicing. This variant is found in 317/121328 control chromosomes (5 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0026128, which is about 261 times of maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.00001), suggesting this variant is benign. In addition, one clinical laboratory classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has been found in one individual with co-occurrence of KCNQ1 c.674C>T/p.S225L (pathogenic) in our laboratory. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/other clinical laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. |
Ambry Genetics | RCV000620127 | SCV000735235 | benign | Cardiovascular phenotype | 2015-07-15 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. |
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, |
RCV000206606 | SCV000743846 | benign | Brugada syndrome 4 | 2016-08-24 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Fulgent Genetics, |
RCV000206606 | SCV002798036 | likely benign | Brugada syndrome 4 | 2022-02-14 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | |
Breakthrough Genomics, |
RCV000585972 | SCV005320482 | benign | not provided | criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | ||
Clinical Genetics, |
RCV000124110 | SCV001920457 | benign | not specified | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | ||
Prevention |
RCV003975099 | SCV004798712 | benign | CACNB2-related disorder | 2019-05-03 | no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). |