Variants from Department of Ophthalmology,Flinders University with conflicting interpretations

Minimum review status of the submission from Department of Ophthalmology,Flinders University:	★☆☆☆ criteria provided ★★★☆ reviewed by expert panel ★★★★ practice guideline	Collection method of the submission from Department of Ophthalmology,Flinders University:	clinical testing curation literature only research other
Minimum review status of the other submission:	★☆☆☆ criteria provided ★★★☆ reviewed by expert panel ★★★★ practice guideline	Collection method of the other submission:	clinical testing curation literature only research other
Minimum conflict level:	confidence conflict (e.g. benign vs likely benign) benign or likely benign vs uncertain conflict category conflict (e.g. benign vs affects) clinically significant conflict (e.g. benign vs pathogenic)
Show significances as they were submitted (without aggregation into standard terms)
		ClinVar version: 2019-07 2019-06 2019-05 2019-04 2019-03 2019-02 2018-12 2018-10 2018-09 2018-07 2018-06 2018-04 2018-02 2018-01 2017-12 2017-10 2017-09 2017-07 2017-05 2017-04 2017-02 2017-01 2016-11 2016-10 2016-08 2016-07 2016-05 2016-04 2016-03 2016-02 2016-01 2015-11 2015-09 2015-08 2015-06 2015-05 2015-03 2015-02 2015-01 2014-12 2014-11 2014-09 2014-08 2014-07 2014-06 2014-04 2014-03 2014-02 2013-12 2013-11 2013-09 2013-08 2013-05 2013-04 2013-01 2012-11

If a variant has more than two submissions, it may have multiple conflicts and therefore be counted in more than one conflict column. If this is the case, the "Variants with any kind of conflict" cell will be less than the sum of the conflicted variants cells to its left.

Variants with only 1 submission	Variants with at least 2 submissions and no conflicts	Variants with a synonymous conflict (e.g. benign vs non-pathogenic)	Variants with a confidence conflict (e.g. benign vs likely benign)	Variants with a benign or likely benign vs uncertain conflict	Variants with a category conflict (e.g. benign vs affects)	Variants with a clinically significant conflict (e.g. benign vs pathogenic)	Variants with any kind of conflict
14	1	0	2	0	0	0	2

Significance breakdown #

In the table below, cells that correspond to a term paired with itself represent synonymous conflicts, i.e. variants that have been annotated with different terms that map to the same standard term. To compare the terms that were actually submitted, check the box in the filters section at the top of this page.

	All submitters
Department of Ophthalmology,Flinders University		pathogenic	likely pathogenic
	pathogenic	0	1
	likely pathogenic	1	0

Submitter to submitter summary #

Submitter	Variants with only 1 submission	Variants with at least 2 submissions and no conflicts	Variants with a synonymous conflict (e.g. benign vs non-pathogenic)	Variants with a confidence conflict (e.g. benign vs likely benign)	Variants with a benign or likely benign vs uncertain conflict	Variants with a category conflict (e.g. benign vs affects)	Variants with a clinically significant conflict (e.g. benign vs pathogenic)	Variants with any kind of conflict
OMIM	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1
GeneDx	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1
Invitae	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1

All variants with conflicting interpretations #

HGVS	dbSNP
NM_000496.2(CRYBB2):c.463C>T (p.Gln155Ter)	rs74315489
NM_005267.4(GJA8):c.134G>C (p.Trp45Ser)	rs864309688